
The nice thing, I think, about blogging is that it gives me an opportunity to rant about pretty much whatever I want once a week. Maybe that’s not so good for the reader but if it’s any consolation it makes me feel just a little bit better.
Anyway, back to my rant. This post has nothing to do with my usual focus on organic and sustainable farming stuff. It has everything to do with a wine competition tasting I poured at last week. Maybe I was just a bit grumpy from working harvest or maybe I was simply jealous since the wine I was pouring at this particular competition (not Michel-Schlumberger, by the way) did not win a medal, but I came out of the experience with a bad taste in my mouth and it certainly wasn’t from the extremely delicious, well balanced chardonnay I was pouring (and drinking).
Wine competitions (and for that matter, wine publication ratings) are an interesting and controversial thing. For those maybe not familiar with the process, here’s how it works. A panel of “qualified wine judges” sit in front of a table full of glasses. Somebody opens a whole buncha wine bottles and pours a small amount of each into a glass. The judges look at the wine, swirl and sip and spit and ponder. Then he or she writes down some notes and assigns the wine a score. That’s it in a nutshell.
To me, there are numerous and obvious problems with this approach. First, it seems silly to render judgment on a wine based on one single sip & spit. That’s like judging a movie after only watching the previews or choosing a spouse based on a single date. Also, certainly when faced with a table full of samples even the most experienced taster will tend to notice the bigger wines – wines of finesse and character and terroir tend to get bulldozed under the ones with more oak and more ripe fruit and more alcohol.
Much more vexing, however, is the notion that the tastes of a few individuals should dictate the tastes of everyone. I’m not saying that wine judges are wrong, I’m just wondering why their opinions are taken as absolute and applicable to the entire universe.
I am not a “wine expert” (and hope to never be one) but here is my simple suggested protocol on how anyone, expert or not, should judge a wine: Take the bottle home. Invite a few friends over for a casual dinner. Cook up something that seems like it will go well with the varietal of wine you are drinking. Greet your guests with glasses of wine and music on the stereo. Sit on the patio and sip on the wine and chat pleasantly with your guests as you nibble on some appetizers and prep the entrée. Move to the dinner table and eat and sip some more and notice how the aromas and flavors of the wine change over the course of the evening. Check out the label. Are you familiar with the appellation? Is the wine organically grown? How does it work with the food? Have you visited the winery? If so, how did you like the vibe there? Ponder these things and drink up and enjoy your dining experience. If there is wine leftover (yeah, as if..) then shove the cork back in and refrigerate the bottle and taste it again the next day. There — that’s it. If you liked the wine, great. If not, that’s great, too – it just means that particular wine is not your style. Try again with another bottle of wine.
Congratulations! You have just made a qualified judgement of the wine without the help of an expert.
But what would happen if everyone took this approach? What would be the ramifications? I guess that we, as a society, would have to eliminate wine competitions. Major wine publications would be forced to either focus on the educational, enlightening and entertaining aspects of wine or go out of business.
I guess we couldn’t have that, could we?
I’m interested…how do you decide about wines? And do scores & competitions influence your wine purchasing decisions? Curious minds want to know…please feel free to add your comments — this could be fun!
